Envoyé par zhepna le Jeudi 16 Décembre 2004 à 15:35
Bonjour, en lisant les questions adresser à Wizard, j'ai eu un doute. Voici le texte en question:
Q: I was wondering, If I was to use Clone and target a legendary creature, say, Keiga, the Tide Star, the Clone becomes Keiga, and they end up killing each other with the new legend rule. However, if after I cast Clone and targeted Keiga, and bounce Clone back to my hand, will Keiga still die and give its controlling effect? --Seifer K.
A: Cloning a Legendary creature will cause both of them to be put into their owner's graveyard [CR 420.5e]. In Keiga's case, this will cause both the original and the Clone controller(s) to stack their triggered abilities in APNAP (active player – non-active player) order. (i.e. the active player chooses a creature, then the non-active player chooses a creature. If both players choose the same creature, the active player will get it in the end.)
As for bouncing the Clone back to your hand, you won't be able do this. Clone comes into play as a copy of Keiga, and before anyone can play spells or abilities, state-based effects are checked. Two Legendary Keigas are in play, so they both die, immediately.
*Extra*: Do note that Clone is not actually targeted. You chose the creature as Clone comes into play. This lets you Clone untargetable creatures. It's an odd way to get rid of Multani, Maro-Sorcerer, but it works.
Si on lit l'extra, il est dit que si on joue Clone sur une créature inciblable (oui, on peut) et que cette créature est, par exemple, Multani, Maro-sorcerer, les deux légende, qui ont maintenant le même nom et sont identiques n'iront pas au cimetière, vu qu'ils sont inciblables.
C'est possible ou mon anglais est vraiment rendu pourri?
___________________ Le futur de magic: http://www.starcitygames.com/php/news/expandnews.php?Article=422
|