cibler

Sujet verrouillé

6 messages · 635 vues · qui a participé ?

Cromat Membre · Légende 896 messages Inscrit le 29/06/2003 Vu en 2014
Mercredi 27 Août 2003 à 21:09 #1
voila, j'ai un problème de règles à propos du fait de "cibler" .
Par exemple je vais prendre cette carte :


1)est-ce que le fait de rediriger une blessure "cible" une créature ? il me semble avoir lu dans certaines règles qu'une carte ne "cible" que s'il y a réellement marqué le mot "ciblé" sur la carte ...
2)donc par exemple, si je redirige à l'infini, pour 0, les blessures de la shamane sur un détachement spécial , est-ce que j'aurai une infini/infini car il est "ciblé" ou est-ce que sa capacité ne se déclenchera pas, car il n'est pas réellement "ciblé"?

merci de me répondre ...
Cromat
arcarum Membre · Modo Forum 4 604 messages Inscrit le 27/11/2002 Vu en 2021
Mercredi 27 Août 2003 à 21:15 #2
règle de redirection
Quote:

G.12 - Damage Redirection

G.12.1 - A spell or ability may cause damage to be "redirected" from a creature or player to another creature or player. This is a replacement effect (see Rule T.10) indicated by the word "instead" such as "all damage that would be dealt to this creature is dealt to you instead". [D'Angelo 1999/05/01]
G.12.2 - Damage redirection spells and abilities can be played even if there is no damage to redirect. [D'Angelo 1999/05/01]
G.12.3 - If the spell or ability redirects a specific amount of damage, you choose which of the points of damage you want to redirect at the time the damage would be dealt. [D'Angelo 1999/05/01]
G.12.4 - If the spell restricts your choice, such as to just damage from a single source, you must follow that restriction. [D'Angelo 1999/05/01]
G.12.5 - Redirected damage is actually dealt by the source to the new location directly. [D'Angelo 1999/05/01] Damage is not dealt to the original location and then moved.
G.12.6 - If either the original recipient of the damage or the new one is not a creature or player, or is not in play (for multi-player games this includes players who leave the game), a damage redirection effect does nothing. [WotC Rules Team 2000/02/16] [DeLaney 2000/02/18] The prevention or redirection effect is "used up" in this case, however. [D'Angelo 2000/02/25]
G.12.7 - If combat damage is redirected to a creature not in the combat, it is still combat damage. [D'Angelo 2001/06/15]
G.12.8 - If damage from a single source is redirected by multiple redirection effects to a single destination, then the damage from all of those redirections arrives as a single chunk of damage from that source as if the source damaged that destination directly. For example, if Lancers en-Kor was used three times to redirect 1 damage three times to a destination, this is identical to using a single redirection of 3 damage. [Barclay 2003/02/21]
Note - Also see Damage, Rule G.10.
Note - Also see Damage Prevention, Rule G.11.
Note - Also see Replacement and Prevention Effects, Rule T.10.



texte du shaman
Quote:

Shaman en-Kor
Color= White Type= Creature - Cleric Cost= 1W SH(R)
Text (SH+errata): 1/2. ; {0}: The next 1 damage that would be dealt to ~this~ this turn is dealt to target creature you control instead. ; {1}{W}: The next time a source would deal damage to target creature this turn, that damage is dealt to ~this~ instead. [Oracle 2000/02/01]
When you redirect damage it is still combat damage. [D'Angelo 1999/06/01]
You can use this ability as much as you want prior to damage being dealt. [D'Angelo 1999/06/01]
It is possible to redirect more damage to a creature than that creature's toughness. [D'Angelo 1998/03/23]
It can redirect damage to itself. [D'Angelo 1998/03/17]
The ability of this card does not do anything to stop Trample damage from being assigned to the defending player (see Rule A.37). [D'Angelo 1998/10/08]
Note - Also see Damage Redirection, Rule G.12.
Note - Also see Trample, Rule A.37.

pas mana, pas chocolat, testé et vérifié, arbitre lvl 2
Cromat Membre · Légende 896 messages Inscrit le 29/06/2003 Vu en 2014
Mercredi 27 Août 2003 à 21:35 #3
Ok .
Donc ma question globale est : une carte ne cible que s'il y a marqué le mot "ciblé" sur cette carte ?
Cromat
vivan4 Membre · Légende 490 messages Inscrit le 24/02/2003 Vu en 2009
Mercredi 27 Août 2003 à 21:52 #4
t'a tout compris cromat
mais y'a souvent des errata et donc je te conseil de lire le texte oracle avant d'etre sur.

le meilleur exemple(et le plus conu) est:le serment des druide.
La mort spectre masqué n'a rien sous sa visière.

Heureux l'élève qui, comme la rivière, suit son cours sans sortir de son lit !!!
Cromat Membre · Légende 896 messages Inscrit le 29/06/2003 Vu en 2014
Mercredi 27 Août 2003 à 21:54 #5
ok merci .
Cromat
frantz_lec Membre · Nomade 0 messages Inscrit le 06/07/2003
Jeudi 28 Août 2003 à 12:06 #6
Shaman en-Kor
{1}{W}
Creature -- Cleric
1/2
{0}: The next 1 damage that would be dealt to Shaman en-Kor this turn is dealt to target creature you control instead.
{1}{W}: The next time a source would deal damage to target creature this turn, that damage is dealt to Shaman en-Kor instead.
Cesse d'écouter la voix de l'avidité, et d'un présent qui t'était destiné tu feras un cadeau pour tous...

Répondre

Connectez-vous ou créez un compte pour écrire sur le forum. Les comptes de l'ancien site fonctionnent avec leur mot de passe.